Showing posts with label Satyam Fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Satyam Fraud. Show all posts
ICAI Interrogates Satyam Auditors and CFO

ICAI Interrogates Satyam Auditors and CFO

3:26 PM Add Comment
CFO ADMITS HIS ROLE IN FALSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS


In terms of directions of the CBI Court, Hyderabad allowing members of the High Powered Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to examine and record statements of the three accused members of the Institute viz. CA. S. Gopalakrishnan, CA. Srinivas Talluri, auditors and CA. Vadlamani Srinivasu, CFO of Satyam, a team led by CA. Uttam Prakash Agarwal, President of the Institute and Chairman of the High Powered Committee along with CA. Shanti Lal Daga, a member of the Committee and a member of the Central Council of the Institute, interrogated the three accused members currently lodged in Chanchalguda Central Prison, Hyderabad.



The interrogation went on for the whole day, during which the CFO admitted his role in aiding the Chairman, B. Ramalinga Raju and Managing Director, B. Rama Raju in fudging and falsifying the accounts by forging and creating fake records. He was candid enough to admit that he along with the Vice President (Finance), G. Ramakrishna, a Cost Accountant by profession were actively involved in the scam. He admitted his involvement in the planning of the scam, which was masterminded by the Chairman and the Managing Director. According to him, another team which was directly reported to the CMD, led by G. Ramakrishna executed the plan by fabricating and preparing false documents such as sales invoices, bank statements, bank confirmations, by involving a team of around 10 junior staff.



The CFO further admitted that neither the auditors nor the independent directors were aware of the scam. He also mentioned that no pecuniary benefits were derived by the auditors and that it was not true that the auditors had confessed to their alleged role, as was reported earlier in the media.



Tracing back the events, the CFO mentioned that what started as a small adjustment in the accounts 5-6 years ago, continued quarter after quarter and year after year and by the second quarter of 2008 had attained unmanageable proportions. He also mentioned that the CMD initially assured that the falsification would be rectified after one or two quarters, but it went on. He stated that he had resisted the attempts, but could not do much in view of master-servant relationship. He stated that he had twice submitted his resignation, but was pursued by the CMD to continue, so that the company does not collapse and the future of 54,000 employees is not endangered.




The CFO expressed his regret and shame on having been a party to the scam, which according to him, was masterminded by the Chairman and Managing Director and abetted by him in planning and by G. Ramakrishna in its execution.




CA. Uttam Prakash Agarwal expressed his satisfaction on the outcome of the interrogation which had vindicated his belief about the credibility of the auditing profession. According to him, despite the existence of Audit Committee, independent directors, internal audit, integrated audit under SOX, information systems audit, whistle blowing mechanism on the inherent risk in the internal controls, the scam had occurred owing to a carefully crafted fraud by creating normal trails and backup support documents and records, which had kept the fraud unchecked and undetected for as much as 5-6 years.




Later in the night, the ICAI submitted a report to the CBI investigation team, prepared by a Group constituted to assist the Multi-disciplinary Investigation Team of the CBI. The report covers the outcome of the limited exercise done by the ICAI Group on the role of auditors in compliance with the Auditing and Assurance Standards issued by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, in respect of some of the issues relating to financials of Satyam for past 4-5 years, based on the copies of the documents provided by the CBI.
Firms committing criminal offences can be prosecuted, but not sent to jail

Firms committing criminal offences can be prosecuted, but not sent to jail

7:11 PM Add Comment
Companies which commit criminal offence can be prosecuted and sentenced to fine, though they cannot be sent to jail as they are only juristic persons. This principle was reiterated by the Supreme Court in the case, Ballarpur Industries Ltd Vs State of Tamil Nadu.

Recalling its 2005 judgment in the case, Standard Chartered Bank Vs Directorate of Enforcement, the court stated that "there is no immunity to the companies from prosecution merely because the prosecution is in respect of offences for which the punishment prescribed is mandatory imprisonment and fine. It has been held that though a company cannot be sentenced to imprisonment, it can nevertheless, be prosecuted and the court can impose punishment of fine instead."
Member-CAs to be punished if found guilty in Satyam scam:ICAI

Member-CAs to be punished if found guilty in Satyam scam:ICAI

6:59 PM Add Comment
Apex body of CAs, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India said severe punishment would be meted out to its member-accountants if they are found guilty in the Rs 7,800-crore accounting fraud at Satyam Computer Services.

“If any of the CAs, who are the members of the institute, are found guilty in the auditing, exemplary punishment would be waiting for them,” ICAI President Uttam Prakash Agarwal said.

Stating that nothing had come on record so far suggesting the involvement of chartered accountants in the Satym scam, he said the probe by high power committee of ICAI would find out any lapse on the part of the auditors.
Tax sleuths join Sathyam probe

Tax sleuths join Sathyam probe

2:00 PM Add Comment
The income tax department has joined the various other agencies in

forming a special team to probe the affairs in Satyam Computer
Services.

IT sources told TOI that Satyam used to pay around Rs 100 crore per annum as income tax. "The confession by B Ramalinga Raju that profits were cooked up over successive years has forced us to launch an enquiry into the returns filed by the company as by showing what now is turning to be inflated figures, they had availed of a lot of concessions," said an official.

The special team, which was constituted on January 12, has got down to business. "The team will examine the balance sheets, financial statements and IT returns filed by the Satyam computers in the past few years," the official said.

Amlendu Das, Director General (investigation) Income Tax, Hyderabad, told TOI that the IT department has began investigation into the Satyam issue and that they were in touch with the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) personnel and SEBI officials.

On the baffling question as to how did the IT department not detect the `inflated' profits, department officials said: "If any firm is inconsistent in paying tax or suddenly started paying less amount as tax, one would examine the accounts. But in Satyam's case, no abnormal filing of returns was noticed."

So far, the IT special team has not visited any of the Satyam offices. IT officials said the need to seize any documents under Section 132 of the Income-Tax Act did not arise so far as most of the tax related records of Satyam are already in the IT department's possession.